After failing to remove Planning Commission Chairman Michael Huck in
December, 2023; Alexander Council Member Joy Gray has had three
re-dos. All of which have failed. This time though she was called-out
for it by fellow Council Member Harold Timmerman.
This latest attempt at a do-over started out as the previous two,
with Gray admitting she's fighting a lost cause. But it's not
harassment.
"So this is just my monthly reassessing y 'all on whether or not
you'd like to remove the head of the planning commission," Gray
began. "I know the answer will probably be, it's probably a
waste of time, but I'm going to keep doing it every month until
either something happens or elections happen."
"So
I would move that we remove Michael Huck, the head of the planning
commission," Gray said.
"Now, would you call
this one, fourth month you brought this up," Timmerman asked?
"Now, wouldn't that be an act of harassment against Mr. Huck?"
"No,"
Gray responded.
"Yes,
it would," Timmerman replied.
Gray
claimed it's not harassment because, "I'm not asking to remove
him from the city, I'm asking to remove him from this position."
After
receiving a second on her motion Gray continued on her latest
reasoning to have Huck removed.
"I've
gotten yet another email this month from someone who works in the
city asking me to bring it up again because of his harassment via
email of people," Gray began. "He harassed some people
literally claiming that there was hacking going on with the city
now."
Background:
At the December, 2023 council meeting Gray made a motion to remove
Huck from the planning commission based on a complaint concerning
comments he made towards another planning commission member after the
October, 2023 planning meeting. That complaint was investigated by
City Attorney Chris Madison with the aid of Assistant Police Chief
Jessica Burnett.
At the January, 2024 council meeting Gray produced a second complaint
to add to the failed attempt in December at removal. Gray said this
one was in the form of a request from an employee with the Little
Rock Water Reclamation Authority (LRWRA). According to Gray, "The
person that represents them has specifically asked if she can speak
with anyone besides Michael Huck, because of his way of conducting
himself with her and his just sort of general rudeness."
Alexander has been waiting since April, 2023 for LRWRA to approve the
city's new master development plan. The LRWRA provides sewer service
to the northern end of Alexander, hence the interest in Alexander's
future plans. Next month will be one year since sending the proposed
plan to it's first stop for approval, the Little Rock Planning
Department.
At the February 20 council meeting Gray tried to use an E-mail sent
by Huck to a member of Metroplan using the city E-mail system. It's
Metroplan that has been aiding Alexander in writing its new master
development plan.
In January Huck asked the mayor and city hall office manager to
produce a report on the previous year's building/construction
permits. This is an annual request by Metroplan as part of the
ongoing updating of the city's master development plan. After not
receiving any acknowledgment or response, Huck asked his Metroplan
contact to make the request and explain its importance. The files
were already started by a previous employee.
It was Gray who was now the insulted one.
"So no, that was not sent by a morose teenage girl," Gray
said. "That was sent by a grown man who represents the city. So,
that's embarrassing."
Since Gray never explained how she acquired an E-mail sent by Huck,
using the city E-mail system, he
questioned a city employee familiar with the system.
"This is now considered 'Harassment' and the word 'Hack' was
never used," Huck said later.
As stated in the original article published March 5 in The
Alexandrian, the city employee said, "No one has
(administrative) privilege at city hall."
After
the publication of the first article, Alexander Mayor Crystal
Herrmann admitted in an E-mail that she has access to everyone's
E-mails. In an update article published March 12 she was quoted as
writing, "The city email which you conduct the Alexander
Planning commission business on belongs to the City of Alexander. As
Mayor (chief executive officer), I hold the administrator role on the
city's email system. If there is a personnel change and/or a large
number of complaints I can and will have the emails forward to my
email. Council member Joy Gray received your inappropriate email from
my office. The Council is over your position and Joy Gray is the
Council member that handles the agenda. As Mayor, if I receive
complaints and it falls under Alexander City Councils [sic]
respectability it will be sent to Joy Gray by my office staff or
myself."
Prior
to the council's vote on the motion, the discussion began with
Council Member Wayne Smith telling Gray this "sounds personal."
"No,
it's not personal Wayne," Gray said.
"It
sounds personal to me," Smith replied.
Gray
then began the monthly listing of grievances starting with October,
2023.
"But
he's done things in meetings where I'm not even there, but he's
admitted to doing it and it's in documentation," Gray said. "The
person has come and told what he's done. He's done things in these
(council) meetings. He's sent emails that are wildly inappropriate,
but again we might as well just go ahead and vote because everyone's
going to be like oh you're harassing a private citizen and that's
rich coming from some people in the council."
Council
Member Joe Pollard asked, "Why do you (not) forgive this?"
"This
is not, this is not church, this is city council," she replied.
"So that's between him or you and whoever you deal with outside
of here at church setting."
Voting "No" were Joe Pollard, Mitchell W. Smith, Harold
Timmerman, and Juanita Wilson. Council member Tony Staton was absent,
which counts as a "No" vote. Voting "Yes" on the
motion were council members Joy Gray, Angela Griffin and Gina R.
Thomas-Littlejohn, resulting in Five "No" and three "Yes."
Planning Commission reappointment process questioned
There was one other agenda item involving the planning commission.
That was the reappointment of Planning Commission Member Rodney
Chapman.
Chapman was the final appointment that completed the five-member
commission. That seat was vacant for five years. He was appointed in
mid-term by the city council in
August, 2022. Chapman is a former city employee working for the
street and parks departments. His term expires April 6, 2024.
In an interesting turn of events, the normal simple reappointment
process became a discussion of whether planning commission seats
should be considered open when the term is expiring; even if the
current planning member is willing to serve another three-year term.
Gray
asked, "I don't have any recollection of, do people on the
planning commission just decide they stay? Does the planning
commission not advertise that position being opened? So do we just
automatically rubber stamp people?"
"We
automatically put them back in there because they're learning what
needs to be done," said Council Member Juanita Wilson. Wilson is
also a member of the planning commission.
Huck
pointed out it was just last year planning commission members Tonya
Prowes and Stephanie Beck were reappointed. Their new terms expire
April 6, 2026.
A
history of Planning Commission appointments
and
re-appointments
The
current Alexander Planning Commission is a reincarnated version of a
previous commission. The original planning commission was disbanded
by the council in 2017 after two members resigned and the council
felt there was a lack of interest, by at least two of the remaining
members, to cooperate with city hall.
City
Council Member Juanita Wilson and former Council Member Michael Huck
were appointed by Mayor Paul Mitchell June 19, 2017. They were
appointed to terms open from the original planning commission, which
expired April 6, 2019. Because a quorum of five is three Huck and
Wilson couldn't hold a meeting until they found a third person.
Former
Council Member Stephanie Beck was appointed by Mitchell in March,
2018. Beck's first term expired April 6, 2020.
With
three out of five members available they were able to hold their
first meeting Tuesday, March 20, 2018. The terms of the two remaining
vacancies would expire April 6, 2020 and April 6, 2021.
Tonya
Prowse was appointed September,
2018. Her first term expired April 6, 2020. That still left
the fifth position vacant and a term to expire April 6, 2021.
The
council reappointed Wilson and Huck at the April, 2019 council
meeting to their first full three-year terms. Those terms would
expire April 6, 2022.
Beck
and Prowse were reappointed by the council April, 2020. Their new
terms would expire April 6, 2023.
In
April, 2022 the city council reappointed
Huck and Wilson for a second time. Their current terms will expire
April 6, 2025.
The
vacant planning commission seat's term expired April 6, 2021
beginning a new term to expire April
6, 2024. In August, 2022
former city employee Rodney Chapman was appointed by the council.
As
stated above, Beck and
Prowse were reappointed for a second time by the council March, 2023.
Their current terms will expire April 6, 2026.
The
vote
In a
roll call vote Council members Joe Pollard, Mitchell W. Smith, Harold
Timmerman, and Juanita Wilson voted "Yes." Voting "No"
were council members Joy Gray and Gina R. Thomas-Littlejohn. Council
Member , Angela Griffin abstained. Council Member Tony Staton was
absent, which counts as a "No" vote. The total count was
four "Yes," Two "No," one abstain and one absent.
With
what amounts to a four, four tie the motion to reappoint failed.
Mayor Herrmann declined to exercise her option to break the tie by
voting "Yes" as permitted under state law. The council took
no decision on advertising the opening.
Under
state law anyone whose term has expired is still able to keep that
position unless they resign or are replaced.
Next Meeting
The
next meeting of the Alexander City Council is April 15, 6:00 PM at
the Alexander Municipal Complex. The public is invited to attend.