In the October 8 article the lawsuit claims the First State Bank in Oklahoma, "was defrauded into thinking it would acquire a mortgage and lease-purchase agreement for improvements to an Alexander fire station that it says were never started."
Gill Ragon Owen, a Little Rock attorney, filed the lawsuit for the bank in Pulaski County Circuit Court last week.
The allegations stem from a 2007 lease-purchase agreement between Alexander and First Government Leasing Co., owned by Paul Anthony Graver of Chicago. In 2007 city officials wanted to combine several loans into a single loan to have one payment and a lower interest rate, saving the city money.
According to the Democrat-Gazette article the agreement between First Government Leasing Co. and First State Bank in Oklahoma, "stated that proceeds from refinancing a loan for the Fire and Police departments would be used to improve a fire station." However, "according to the bank’s complaint, the money was used to pay off debts on police vehicles and purchase a firetruck."
The Democrat-Gazette article goes on to quote court documents which claim, "the city took out a mortgage on the fire-station loan in First Government’s name. In May 2012, Lance Dominique of Chicago sent an offer letter to First State Bank to sell the lease-purchase agreement to the bank. The bank paid Graver $393,910.55 for the agreement."
The article continues;
Graver executed an assignment document giving the bank undivided interest in and to the lease-purchase agreement, but according to the bank’s complaint, neither the mortgage nor the purchase agreement were assigned to the bank as agreed upon.
The bank also found out that in 1992, Graver admitted to facilitating the purchase or sale of securities by means of “manipulative, deceptive, and other fraudulent devices” and that he consented to be barred from association with any broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer thereafter, according to the lawsuit.
Alexander still owes 100 payments of $4,970.83 each on the loan, but it quit paying First State Bank in March and has refused to pay since then because the city maintains that the lease-purchase agreement violates the Arkansas Constitution and is therefore void, according to the complaint.
The state's audit of Alexander's 2007 budget year shows the city entered into a 14-year loan in violation of the five year maximum. At the time the city entered into the loan agreement the state's Constitution had recently been changed to allow governmental bodies to take on debt but with a five-year maximum on all loans. Later, city officials learned the interest rate had been increased to above the state's legal maximum.
The Democrat-Gazette article continues;
“Graver has a pattern and practice of defrauding Arkansas cities and counties by enticing them to issue invalid lease purchase agreements,” according to the bank’s lawsuit.
“Graver intentionally structured the lease purchase agreement in a way that violates Arkansas law, and Graver and Dominique intentionally offered to sell and sold the lease purchase agreement to First State Bank as a duly authorized, valid and binding obligation of Alexander … when in fact Graver and Dominique knew the lease purchase agreement in no way complied with Arkansas law … contained numerous misrepresentations and omitted information necessary to make the representations that were made not misleading.”
According to a document accompanying the complaint, Graver and Dominique offered to sell First State Bank a number of other lease-purchase agreements from all over the country, including three in Arkansas in Caney township, Reed, and Saline County.
Article 16 of the Arkansas Constitution bars cities from lending credit for any purpose and issuing any interest-bearing evidences of indebtedness. Three amendments allow cities to incur debt, but Alexander’s lease agreement didn’t comply with any of them. First State Bank maintains that Graver and Dominique failed to disclose that when selling the agreement.
“If they had, First State Bank would never have acquired the lease purchase agreement,” according to the lawsuit. “The failure to disclose that the obligation was not valid makes the representation that the interest would be tax exempt misleading.”
The offer also didn’t disclose that the agreement included a nonappropriation clause that allowed Alexander to terminate the obligation in any year it failed to appropriate enough money to make payments, according to the complaint. First State Bank offered to sell the lease-purchase agreement back to Graver and Dominique for the amount it originally paid, minus payments it received from Alexander and plus $5,000 in attorney costs but hasn’t gotten a reply.
The bank is asking for a judgment on the validity of Graver’s assignment of the lease-purchase agreement to the bank, the validity of the agreement itself and at least $381,174.27 in relief from Graver and Dominique. From Alexander, the bank seeks the amount totaling the full payments required under the agreement plus attorney fees and costs.
Alexander Mayor Michelle Hobbs refused to speak to a reporter through an assistant Monday. City Attorney Carla Miller refused to comment on the lawsuit.
The Citizens of Alexander can "THANK" Jerry Ball, EX-Councilman, for this deal.
ReplyDeleteHe always bragged about his abilities as a financial wizard. If you look at the contracts his name appears on them. Guess he knows "FINANCIAL CROOKS"
and how to find them. Ex-Mayor Johnson saw a way to get what looked like
"FREE MONEY".
Hope the Judge decides to clean the slate on all parties except the first lending instituation.
Bill.
The Judge will decide who is innocent and who is guilty. Bill, didn't you mean the 'last' lending institution?
ReplyDeleteIf the "mafia loan, Chicago branch) initiated the original document according to the paper to defraud the various Municipalities of Arkansas, likely it came through Mayor level (Mayor to Mayor) but that is merely speculation.
It is an interesting turn of events. I would think it would be the responsibility of the Chicago people to repay the Oklahoma people, Alexander received and spent the money and will have to pay it to someone. My training has always been, you maintain the account in good standing, and present your case during the process. JoAn Churchill
JoAn,
ReplyDeleteSome good thought. There was never any money spent from the loans The loans for the Old City
were merged and all the annexed Fire Dept Property was hocked. All the hocked property was paid for when it was hocked. X-Mayor Johnson was glad to see all our property and money for her to use. Looks like Mayor Michelle may be following in her foot steps. Guess she got trained by the best or maybe it just comes with the "JOB"
The City does need to pay but not the big interest rates.
Maybe the Judge will see this. X-Mayor Paul was also involved in the Jerry Ball
dealings. I guess he used this experience for his campaign slogans.
Bill
Bill, It is my understanding when that loan was taken, all officials were involved. We like to blame Shirley and we LOVE to blame Paul, and even Jerry. Fact is city authorities took out a jumbo loan, paid it according to contract until I left office, Mayor decided to quit paying, THEN ask questions. Proper procedure is just the opposite, KEEP THE LOAN CURRENT, AND ASK QUESTIONS ON THE SIDE. It quite likely is an illegal loan, but you don't put the city in the position of large legal fees (and our city attorney charges large legal fees in everything she does), bad ratings, media attention, and increased rates for most things in the future.
DeleteI could very well be wrong, but it is my deduction that the city attorney and the Municipal League have to work pretty hard to justify some of the things this mayor does.
Just for the record, a personal note - my comp pay was written on time, mayor held it, wouldn't sign it, - it was completely approved, earned and negotiable. The only problem is that the direct deposit wasn’t accomplished until I gave up on her and did the direct deposit on February 4th, and voided the original check. I should have ‘stopped-pay’ instead of voiding. Either way whatever the council votes about it will be accomplished. They are fair people, intent on the health of the town.
JoAn Churchill
So, What does this mean to the average resident of the city?
ReplyDeleteThis means that the "AVERAGE CITIZEN" has only one fire truck to
Deleteprotect them and their property. The Cities' legal council seems to not know what she is advising Mayor Michelle to do.The Mayor should have got some input from the City Council before stopping these payments. In my opinion the payments should have continued during the legal wrangling but put into an account with
equal ownership by Alexander and First State Bank.
Looks like the Citizens of South Alexander are going to loose all the Fire Department Property. I do not understand why Garver had the right to
reposes the property when they sold the contract.
Mayor Michelle sure is not improving the image of Alexander. Seems like the lending institution opinion of her is more correct and to the point. I remember at one Council Meeting Councilman McKeon ask the City Attornry if we could lose our hocked property because the City stopped payment on the loan. She said that we "WOULD NOT" because the lawsuit was filed. What happened City Attorney????.
I would hate to pay her the "BIG BUCKS" for the kind of information she gives out!!!.
The City is in the RED now, so where did the payments go???
Mayor Michelle needs to come forward with some answers at the next Council Meeting to important questions that need to be answered. She has had long enough standing behind "I TOOK OVER AS MAYOR WITH EVERYTHING IN THE RED. She needs to ask for input from the Council and
try to do things RIGHT and by the LAW. Like I said before-"SHE LEARNED HOW TO RUN THE CITY FROM THE BEST". Now look where we are!!!!
I thought that the Council put the order for 7 new police cars on hold. The City Attorney even said at a Council Meeting that an Ordinance had to be approved before they could be ordered. I was at Landers a couple of weeks ago and saw 7 new Black & White Charges unloaded. I was told that they were for Alexander. Who ordered them????
Bill
Bill
So does anyone know whats going on with the firestation? The fireman appear to be on their own. The mayor has been a no show on tv and I wonder if she's even talked with them? If she hasn't then who has? Bill, Louelle let us know? I've asked around and have been told the bare minimum. I hope the lawyer is happy, she said this wouldn't happen and it did. Please Mrs. Attorney don't tell us the world won't end cause it just might. I want to support our city and employee's and firemen keep your head up, we the citizens care about you!!!!!
ReplyDeleteP.B. The most important thing is; s far as I can find out no one, not mayor, not city attorney, NOONE has communicated with City council - WHO BY LAW IS IN CONTROL OF ALL FINANCES. As far as I can find out, they were never asked if the city could quit paing payments to the loans, seems to be the city was placed in direct line of fire for a humongous law suit. It looks to me like they are calling the note, 1/2 million, anybody got any savings?
ReplyDeleteLook around folks, the Fire Department has been almost completely dismantled. Main truck is only the last thing gone, Chief is on medical leave, many firemen have quit for the simple fact the y couldn't work under present administration. Their checking account is cloaked in clouds and their reserve doesn't exist any more. Wasn't that the initial plan?
- Louella Dinglehardt
Thank you for the update, very nice site.. Antonio Vega caso Quimagro
ReplyDelete