Pages

Saturday, January 31, 2015

Alexander Council approves 2015 budget, City should adopt subdivision rules, & meets new police chief

In a unanimous vote, the Alexander City Council approved the budget for fiscal year 2015 amidst some confusion. Two budgets had been presented to council members; one by Mayor Paul Mitchell and one by Alderwoman Andrea Bearden.

Mitchell thought he was using a copy of the 2014 budget and relabeling it for 2015 as a temporary measure to meet the mandatory January 31 deadline the state requires for municipalities and counties to establish a budget. The fiscal year runs from January 1 to December 31.

Bearden told council members a budget committee had been adjusting the 2014 budget throughout the year. That's the budget she gave the council during the emergency meeting on January 6.

"The one I handed out on the sixth (January) is the same exact budget (for 2014) minus the health employee insurance and the raises that have not been handed out," she said.

Bearden also explained the budget Mitchell had was based on a report found in the accounting program that had revenue for the police department $50,000 more than it actually received. That error is corrected in her budget.

Another point made by Bearden was the State of Arkansas is expected to send cities and counties four-percent less in revenue for the general fund and street fund. While attending the annual summer seminar conducted by the Arkansas Municipal League she learned the state is expecting a drop in sales and fuel tax revenue. Arkansas shares its sales tax and fuel tax with cities and counties.

The budget approved by all eight of the aldermen, at their regular meeting held January 26, projects a total revenue for 2015 of $946,129.16. Mitchell reminded the council the budget can be amended throughout the year.

In other business;
City needs to adopt subdivision rules
The council heard a report from Bob McKeon on the Meadow Edge Subdivision. As a member of the Saline County Water Works Board, McKeon has been in discussions with the developers in preparation for providing the subdivision with water and sewer services.

Since the city has yet to establish a new planning commission McKeon told council members the developers will design and construct the subdivision based on the requirements established in the Saline County Subdivision Rules and Regulations. He said the document covers everything and recommended the city adopt the county's subdivision requirements as its own.

This would normally be handled by the planning commission but a new commission is still in the process of being established. A planning commission ordinance was approved near the end of 2014 but commission members have yet to be appointed.

McKeon said the streets will be turned over to the city one year after completion of each subdivision section. He expects the streets won't need maintenance for about ten years.

The subdivision is being built on a former cattle farm along Highway 111, which was recently sold by its owners Steve and Pam Scroggins. The approximate 200-acre farm is divided by the highway with the largest portion on the west side. The initial plan is to build 200 homes on the largest portion first, with another 100 homes to possibly be added later. The development plan also includes keeping most of the wooded area, the pond and providing a walking trail.

Free coupons no longer free
McKeon also represents Alexander on the Saline County Solid Waste District Board (SCSWD). In his report about recent developments he said the SCSWD has a program which provides each Saline County resident two coupons per year to be used at the landfill. The landfill operator, Republic Services, is now charging the district sales tax for the coupons.

McKeon said the district will, "Provide coupons for each residential household and the cost is $2.50 a coupon, that's to cover tax."

Each resident is limited to two coupons per calendar year and the coupons must be used during that year. Each coupon will be registered to the person who picks up the coupon and that same person must present the coupon at the landfill when delivering their load. An ID must be provided when picking up the coupons and when using them at the landfill.

Starting in 2016 you will, "have to prove you have household trash pick-up," McKeon added.

Coupons may be obtained at the SCSWD office, 114 West Sevier Street, in Benton. The landfill is located at 18511 West Sardis Road in Bauxite.

McKeon also reported the black recycling boxes have been removed due to cost and misuse. Saline County residents can still take recyclable items to the landfill for free. When unloading your vehicle the various items will have to be placed in the proper containers provided at the landfill.

Meeting the new police chief
Alexander aldermen were introduced to the new Police Chief, John Fenton. Fenton took-over as chief January 15 replacing former Police Chief Derrick Jackson. Jackson was appointed chief in November by former Mayor Michelle Hobbs after serving nearly a year as interim chief.

In his first report to the council Fenton said he is amending the policy and procedures manual. It will be given to both the city attorney and council members for review and changes will be made if necessary. He expects to present the final version for approval at the next meeting.

Mayor Mitchell added that he doesn't believe the current manual was ever presented to a council. As best he can tell it was written by a previous chief and adopted without council approval.

One question raised was whether Fenton is full-time or part-time. He said he's part-time for now but that is only a difference of one hour. He also added remaining the police chief is contingent on whether everyone is satisfied with his performance.

Organization of City Council approved
Another annual task was performed by the aldermen with the approval of the, "Organization of City Council 2015" manual. Required under state law the manual establishes not only how public meetings will be conducted but also includes how, "The Mayor, City Council, and Committees, Sub-Committees, boards, commissions, and any appointed official or employee," will perform their duties.

Alderwoman Bearden presented the 2015 version to the council at the January 6, emergency meeting allowing aldermen time to review the document. At the January 26, regular meeting she pointed out the only change made from the 2014 version is to allow anyone who asks to be on the agenda to speak to the council before discussing the minutes. She said this will keep them from having to wait.

The next regular meeting of the Alexander City Council will be held Monday, February 23, 6 pm in city hall. Regular meetings are normally held the third Monday of the month but due to the holiday the meeting was moved to the following Monday. The public is invited to attend.


23 comments:

  1. It's funny how Mr McKeon said that the new planned subdivision streets will be turned over to the city when he gave the poor people of St Joseph's Glen hell about their roads by saying that the city didn't own their roads or were responsible for them. I wonder if the citizens of Alexander knows what's in it for Mr McKeon. Maybe this new subdivision will help him financially? It seems the reason why the water bills in Alexander are so high is that Mr McKeon owes a lot of money. He owns the water company!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We live in a great country where everyone can have an opinion ... even when they don't know what they're talking about. What a country!

      Delete
  2. I do not know why you think Mdkeon owns the water, he is just administrator, who has an 8 member board , supposedly the water association is supposed to belong to the residents

    ReplyDelete
  3. He owns the building that the water company is housed in and he has a lot of debt. Why do you think the water their is so high.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Prove he owns the building. As for his debt, according to county records he has or had a mortgage on his house for improvements, I assume. And, he has purchased some property that were over due on taxes.

      Delete
  4. This is the third city that I have lived in to be supplied by Central Arkansas Water. After consulting with friends that still live in these other cities, I can attest that the water bills here are indeed more than double the cost of the other two cities, and those other two cities have curbside garbage and recycling included on the bill.
    Personally, I would be curious as to why we received such a poor deal on this service contract.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. For those of you who just moved here, the City of Alexander is in two counties; Pulaski and Saline. The Pulaski area is served by what is now Central Arkansas Water. The Saline portion is served by Saline County Water and Sewer, formerly Woodland Hills Water and Sewer. The Woodland Hills section annexed into Alexander in 2006, hence the name change. Aside from the usual franchise agreement it has with the other utilities the city does not operate, own, or contract prices for the water and sewer system. Just as it doesn't own, operate, or contract prices for power, phone, or cable. If you have any complaints contact the state utility commission.

      Delete
  5. Alexander may be serviced by Saline County Water and Sewer, but the yearly water quality reports mailed to my home each year are on the Central Arkansas Water letterhead. I did not accuse anyone of any wrong doing, just curious as to why this is the most I have ever paid for water and sewer alone, ever, across 4 states in cities large and small.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Which part of Alexander are you in, Pulaski or Saline county? For that matter, are you actually IN Alexander?

      Delete
  6. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh my, It seems I have hit a nerve.
      mhck52, I can assure you that I am a citizen of Alexander, in Saline County. I am a property owner, tax payer, registered and active voter. I pay my water bill every month at the little office, just like everyone else. The topic was raised, and as a resident, I expressed curiosity over the issue as well.
      Instead of opening a dialogue about the concerns, or rationally explaining the circumstances, you chose to shut me down by accusing me of either lying or being too stupid to know where I live. This tells me everything I will ever need to know about you, and serves as a glaring example of where our city leadership has gone wrong in the past.

      Delete
    2. vin if u live in saline county part of alexander, then CAW neither supplies or get paid for your water/ CHECK IT OUT BEFORE YOU RAIL ON SOMEONE!!!

      Delete
    3. I did not "rail" on someone, I expressed displeasure over being called stupid and a liar.
      I have already explained that I receive reports from CAW through the mail that claim that they are the source of the water that is delivered to my home. Again, more rudeness instead of answers, more accusations instead of dialogue. Please re-read the thread, I have only asked questions and have only received vitriol in response, including from you.

      Delete
    4. Vin, sounds like you asked to right questions? The ones that apparently do hit nerves and the ones that bloggers on here might be involved with. I'm impressed.

      Delete
    5. I do not know Mr McKeon, and really do not care.... I have no ancient quarrels with anyone in town and have no ulterior motives. I simply wanted to know if it could be explained to me why my quality reports come from another source than my bill and why it's so much higher than any other water service I have had in the state... or any other state for that matter.
      Stoking old feuds instead of communicating and working on solutions, and residents being vilified instead of receiving answers to legitimate questions are exactly the types of behavior that will continue to hold Alexander back.

      Delete
    6. Let's take this one-by-one. Your comment, "Personally, I would be curious as to why we received such a poor deal on this service contract," implied you assumed the city is some how contracting for water and sewer services, which it isn't. The only departments Alexander has is police, fire and streets.

      We also have the situation of existing in two counties, which also causes the division in water and sewer service. Of course, what is now Central Arkansas Water use to be Little Rock. Since the Pulaski County side of Alexander butts up against Little Rock naturally Little Rock was allowed to provide service to that area avoiding the city that headache. The same with Woodland Hills/Saline County Water and Sewer.

      It also causes a problem at election time. In 2010 KARN 102.9 FM announced that Shirley Johnson and Paul Mitchell won the mayor's race. They didn't know they are suppose to add votes from two counties.

      Alexander addresses are another issue. Just because someone has an Alexander address doesn't mean they live "in Alexander." Our post office extends all the way to the northeast corner of Saline County. When you read a crime related story that allegedly happened "in Alexander" and the only police mentioned is the Sheriff's office it probably wasn't "in Alexander."

      As for your bill; you might try comparing the water and sewer costs separately to your other locations. The sewer plant was recently doubled in size to the tune of something like $20 million. The board of directors on their own decided to approve a bond issue, which increased the sewer rate; doubled it as I recall. And before you ask; no, we didn't get to vote and no, the board members are not elected. They are appointed by the county.

      Finally the water quality letter; since I haven't seen ours I can't compare what we received with yours. My wife gets that mail. I don't know if CAW thinks all of Alexander is in Pulaski County. I think Saline County Water has an emergency back-up waterline connection with CAW and maybe that's why you would get the letter. I don't know if SCW uses CAW to test the water. If that's the case maybe SCW mailed out copies of the report. What's the return address on the envelope? Your only other option would be to call the water department and ask why you received a quality letter from CAW.

      Delete
  7. The reason the bill is high is the upgrade that was very expensive very necessary and very timely. It is my understanding that the bill will be reduced when the debt is paid. I don’t recall when that is. I have no complaints on it; as long as it works I’m happy. Sewer problems would change the whole dynamic, but we don’t have sewer problems because of the upgrade. The new addition coming in will not threaten that, and hopefully the debt on the upgrade will be spread out a little making it easier on everyone (unless it is ‘grandfathered’ to current residents.)
    I have no reason to believe Mr. McKeon doesn’t know what he’s doing. I also have no reason to think he is anything other than responsible in what he does.
    I believe CAW does the testing; but I don’t know that. I do know we have good tasty water, I enjoy it, I enjoy going into the water office, Linda or who ever else I have encountered there have always been kind, helpful, efficient, and friendly. I bought my land in 2003, I like it here; there is a lot to do and the vision of the current mayor more closely resembles my vision; which is a nice fit.
    Wendy mentions the “poor people of St, Joseph’s Gen” and their streets. The problem is St. Joseph’s Glen is tied up in a Property Owners Association that involves the ownership of the streets. It is a legal fiasco, and it isn’t Mr. McKeon’s responsibility, nor is it the city’s to maintain their streets until the legal issues they are bound with are finalized. I am sorry for their problems too. The immediate answer is to raise the dues and fix the streets. The long term – only a good attorney can answer that one!
    JoAn Churchill

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My understanding is not everyone is paying their dues. Part of the problem is also with the developers; they've skipped.

      And actually, the streets are fine. The entire issue is with two or three spots in the newest section that look like repairs that weren't completed. You can see cut marks in the pavement. Somebody didn't do the final repaving.

      Delete
  8. Interesting, I've not been down there to look, probably should have, except for church out-reach for Bible School or when campaigning.
    JoAn

    ReplyDelete
  9. SJG roads- as it was told to me:
    The cut out spots are from a few years ago when the roads became impassable. Large sections had been heaved up several feet from the surface of the road as if they had been plowed. This only affected what was the final section laid, and it was discovered that the foundation had not been properly prepared before the asphalt was installed. This meant that any patching would only heave up again. It was decided that the sections would just be filled with gravel to make a more even surface until it could be settled exactly who needed to be held responsible for the proper repairs, and could be made to pay for them.
    It is my opinion that the cost should be covered by the HOA (since they treat the area as a private, gated community that is self-governed) and then the HOA should sue the company/contractor responsible for the shoddy work to recoup their expenses. This of course is only based upon my past experiences with HOAs and how they operate elsewhere.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think someone mentioned an underground spring or something along that line, which means the developer didn't do his homework, or got greedy and didn't care. The HOA needs to collect all the dues and sue the developer.

      Delete