Pages

Monday, April 20, 2015

Former Alexander Mayor gets one year ... on planning commission

COMMENTARY
I'm going to skip the usual fair and unbiased reporting of the City of Alexander's monthly meeting and go straight to commentary. I do this because after serving four months in its current configuration this council has shown it's made up of weak, naive, underhanded, bootlicking, and just plain stupid aldermen.

Without appearing on the agenda and without her resume being provided to the aldermen in their meeting packets; former Mayor Shirley Johnson managed to finagle her way onto the city's planning commission. She will serve a one-year term followed by a three-year term to whomever is appointed to that position. Gee, I wonder who it will be.

The unexpected action occurred at the April 20 meeting with future ex-Alderwoman Andrea Bearden leading the way. Without making a motion to put the appointment on the agenda (which is required and should have been done at the start of the meeting) Bearden blurted out at the start of New Business, "I make a motion to appoint Shirley Johnson to the Alexander Planning Commission for a term of one year." Future ex-Alderman and Shirley Johnson boot-licker Andy Mullins seconded the motion.

It's interesting that while none of the aldermen had a copy of Johnson's resume in their packet Bearden had plenty to hand out. How convenient.

When asked by Bearden, Johnson said she turned in her resume Monday, 
April 13. Packets are usually available by Thursday or Friday the week before the meeting.

Bearden's reasoning for appointing Johnson is, "We don't have anybody representing District-1, Ward-1, on the planning commission." And, magically Shirley Johnson comes to the rescue.

Johnson stood before the council and gave a low-spoken oratory of sweetness that would give a diabetic a seizure.

"I would like to work with the planning commission ... Bob (McKeon) and I have worked on projects before, we don't always agree," Johnson said, "I've lived here over 70 years."

McKeon was appointed to the planning commission two weeks ago at a special meeting. We'll get back to that later.

The final vote was seven "Yes" and one "No." Because Alderwoman Stephanie Beck was absent from the meeting she was counted as a "No" vote.

Before Johnson spoke Alderwoman Melissa Rutledge asked Bearden if this was, "The same Shirley Johnson you were talking about when we were doing the employee manual?"

After Bearden replied yes Rutledge said, "And, you're nominating her for the planning commission?"

After Johnson was defeated by current Mayor Paul Mitchell in the November, 2010 election Johnson tried to collect a pension based on the retirement section of the employee manual. It was eventually determined that section was illegal and has been stricken from the manual. Johnson was mayor when it was passed in October 2005 and went into effect January 2006. Eventually, enough Johnson worshipers ended up on the council to award her an $820 monthly pension; which is still in effect. Current Ward-2 Alderman Andy Mullins was one of the aldermen who voted for her pension.

But there's more to the Johnson legacy. After the completion of St. Joseph's Glen Johnson admitted during a council meeting the planning commission allowed the developers to build St. Joseph's Glen without paying for building permits. Translation; I convinced commission members it would be a good thing for Alexander. It was also illegal since planning commissions have no authority to approve anything, they only recommend.

Current Mayor Mitchell was on the council at the time she made that statement. And, since she wasn't on the agenda for this meeting no one could attend to counter why she shouldn't be on the planning commission.

This was not the process used when the other four members were appointed to the planning commission. A workshop meeting was held Monday evening March 23 in which aldermen interviewed five applicants for the five available planning commission seats. They were Robert "Bob" McKeon, former Alderman Michael Huck, John W. Reeves, Sr., Deanna Reeves, and current Alderwoman Andrea Bearden. Former Ward-1 Alderwoman Ceola Bailey submitted a resume but did not attend the workshop. Ward-1; that's where Johnson lives.

At a special meeting, held Monday, April 6 the seven aldermen present and mayor went into executive session to discuss the applicants. After the executive session they nominated and appointed McKeon to a three-year term, Deanna Reeves and Bearden to two-year terms, and John W. Reeves, Sr. to a one-year term. Each applicant received seven "Yes" votes and one "No" vote due to the absence of Alderwoman Melissa Ratliff.

A motion was made to appoint former Alderman Michael Huck to a one-year term. He received only one "Yes" vote from Alderman Dan Church. This left Alexander with one vacancy on the planning commission. How far ahead was this planned?

Planning commission mischief and illegal employee manuals aren't her only legacy. The Arkansas Division of Legislative Audit (ADLA) conducts an annual audit of municipalities and other government entities. The audit consists of a review of accounting practices and whether or not they meet state requirements. Under her reign as mayor, starting with the calendar year 1998 and ending in 2010, the ADLA listed the following items.

1998 - "The Mayor did not provide a budget for the Police and Water Development Funds. Total expenditures for these funds were $35,179.32. Budgets are necessary for control of expenditures."

"The Recorder/Treasurer did not transfer $13,150.08 of highway turnback funds deposited into the General Fund to the Street Fund. This amount, combined with previous years [sic] improper transactions, resulted in the General Fund owing the Street Fund $48,070.11."

1999 - "Street Fund turnback in the amount of $3,979.29 was deposited to the General Fund." The General Fund now owes the Street Fund $52,049.40.

2000 - "Street Fund turnback in the amount of $5,646.03 was deposited to the General Fund." The General Fund now owes the Street Fund $57,695.43.

2001 - "Street Fund turnback in the amount of $14,849 was deposited in the General Fund." The General Fund now owes the Street Fund $72,544.43.

2002 - "Street Fund turnback in the amount of $11,977 was deposited in the General Fund." The General Fund now owes the Street Fund $84,521.43.

2003 - "Street Fund turnback in the amount of $7,638 was deposited in the General Fund." The General Fund now owes the Street Fund $92,159.43.

2004 - Everyone performed well this year.

2005 - "State aid for highway funds in the amount of $10,184.31 was not transferred to the Street Fund from the General Fund ... . State aid from previous years has also not been transferred with a total of $106,072.99 due to the Street Fund from the General Fund at December 31, 2005."

2006 - "The General Fund disbursements exceeded appropriations by $306,843 (116%)." This means Mayor Johnson spent more money than the council had budgeted and didn't present aldermen with an adjusted budget.

"State aid for highway funds in the amount of $29,297 was not transferred to the Street Fund from the General Fund," the report states. "State aid from previous years has also not been transferred with a total of $135,370 due to the Street Fund from the General Fund at December 31, 2006."

As a historical reference, it was in August of 2006 that Woodland Hills was annexed to the City of Alexander.

2007 - "State aid for highway funds in the amount of $24,543 was not transferred to the Street Fund from the General Fund. State aid from previous years has also not been transferred with a total of $159,913 due to the Street Fund from the General Fund at December 31, 2007."

2008 & 2009 - This was a combined audit conducted in 2010 because no audits were done in 2009.

"General Fund total disbursements for 2008 exceeded appropriations by $178,707 (27%)." Once again aldermen were not given an opportunity to approve an amended budget.

"State aid for highway turnback funds from previous years has not been transferred from the General Fund to the Street Fund. The total amount due to the Street Fund at December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $112,806 and $132,792, respectively."

It was about this time the aldermen discovered the illegal use of Street Fund revenue and passed a motion requiring that money go directly into the Street Fund. The council also began budgeting repayments from the General Fund to the Street Fund. If you'll notice the amount owed from the General Fund to the Street Fund between 2008 and 2009 has been reduced.

2010 - "The governing body did not review the prior agreed-upon procedures report and accompanying comments at the first regularly scheduled meeting following receipt of the report as required by Ark. Code Ann. § 10-4-418." According to state law council members are suppose to review the report and take the necessary actions to correct any errors before the report is sent to the ADLA.

"State aid for highway turnback funds from previous years was not transferred from the General Fund to the Street Fund. The total amount due to the Street Fund at December 31, 2O1O was $97,933."

Racial profiling
Then there's the opinion of U.S. District Judge G. Thomas Eisele issued in March of 2010 when he ruled against Alexander in a racial profiling lawsuit. In 2009 several male Hispanics filed a lawsuit charging former Police Officer Tommy Leath with targeting Hispanics for traffic stops. A review of citations he issued showed he had a higher percentage for Hispanics than other Alexander officers. Included in the lawsuit were Johnson and former Police Chief Allen Spears.

"In late April (2009), Mayor Johnson was specifically notified by a citizen, Jamie Guardado, of the allegation that Leath was racially profiling Hispanics," Judge Eisele said in his ruling. "Once advised of such a serious allegation, Johnson, at a minimum, should have reported the allegation to Spears and ensured that they (the allegations) were properly investigated. She was deliberately indifferent not to so act."

He also said, "The record indicates and the Court finds that City policy-makers Mayor Johnson and Chief Spears knew that Leath was targeting Hispanics but took no action to stop him. By their silence, they both condoned his conduct and allowed it to continue."

Back taxes owed the IRS
After Paul Mitchell became Mayor in January, 2011 he and the council learned of another secret Johnson kept hidden from aldermen. The City of Alexander owed several thousand dollars in back payments and penalties to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).

Rather than working out a payment plan with the IRS she hired a Texas company to make the IRS go away. Thanks to former Mayor Johnson Alexander started 2011 not only owing the IRS but a couple more thousand to this company, which of course was not able to make the IRS vanish.

This is the person the city council has appointed to the new planning commission. I wonder how long it will take her to get it running like the old planning commission. And, don't you doubt that she won't use it to get back on her throne.

Since I have absolutely no use for this wimpy, get-along, anti-Paul Mitchell, hail Queen Shirley council I am shutting down this blog. Now that you've let the termite back into the house the structure will begin to once-again rot from the inside.


43 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. If you live in the city, you should be upset. he is correct. Alexander is in need of better representation than it is getting now on the council

      Delete
    2. And rightly so; read the "rap-sheet" above and tell me why they would prefer that person over Michael Huck, who is fair and very committed to doing the fair and honest thing!

      Delete
  2. From all I’ve seen and heard, it is amazing how dumb sheep can be. Alderman Bearden is whining about a $0.33 cent bank fee, and a $1.01 and is taking $75.00 per-diem to drive into Little Rock to a meeting AND INCLUDING A NON-MEMBER OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION WHO WILL GET THE SAME! And all the little sheep will pat her on the back for the ‘achievement.’

    ReplyDelete
  3. She don't take the $100.00 per month to serve on the City council but will sure take the $75.00 per-diem.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Would you please you check your grammar before you blog, we are all dumber now!

      Delete
    2. areyou a grammar major? If not, lighten up!!!

      Delete
    3. I think this blog-site is for the purpose of opining, not to show how grammatically intelligent or correct you are. Ardor happens!!!

      Delete
  4. First of all, I would absolutely be ashamed if the blog were shut down. I have been keeping an eye on it only hoping that more become interactive.

    We still have the power of the vote. It's never to early to start planning your ballet choices for next term.

    I am tired of the leeches sucking our city government into their web of drama and bewilderment. None of us pay taxes here to be represented by illiterates starved for attention. We need MORE PEOPLE to show up at these meetings and support what's right! Bring your issues to the council and press that they be addressed!



    ReplyDelete
  5. Well said, Ms Cummings; there is so much to be done in the community that would help the residents and to waste time in trivial pursuit to pet your own petty personal desires and needs is shameful. The voting record at the bottom of this page reflects progress. We are getting ready to go into May, but nothing of significance has been done since February. I hope the resistant council and the planning commission can come up with better than what we have experienced so far.

    ReplyDelete
  6. So no one has explained why this blog operator (UCS) is mad at Mrs. Bearden? I thought they were friends?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Who cares why they are mad at her. Since the blog-master is a pseudonym who knows; who cares. They has as much right as the rest of us.

      Delete
  7. I agree with Wendy. I would like to know why the blog operator is so upset with Ms Bearden. I have asked about the per diem paid to Ms Bearden and was informed this amount was approved by the Mayor and the Council members in a previous meeting. Ms. Bearden also used the money to make copies of the DVD and packets provided during the meeting for several members of the Planning Commission who were not able to attend. I feel like Ms Bearden is saving the City of Alexander money by not accepting the $100 salary offered to her. I would like to know how many of the other Council members are NOT accepting the salary.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I agree with Wendy. I would like to know why the blog operator is so upset with Ms Bearden. I have asked about the per diem paid to Ms Bearden and was informed this amount was approved by the Mayor and the Council members in a previous meeting. Ms. Bearden also used the money to make copies of the DVD and packets provided during the meeting for several members of the Planning Commission who were not able to attend. I feel like Ms Bearden is saving the City of Alexander money by not accepting the $100 salary offered to her. I would like to know how many of the other Council members are NOT accepting the salary.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. YUP! It WAS approved by Mayor and council to pull tax payer money to drive to Little Rock, with the Mayor drawing the most money!!! NOT THIS MAYOR, you're right it was previous.

      Delete
  9. Well, in my opinion, the council is nothing but a hot house of trivia. Reports are given and nothing happens but grandstanding, that one alderman, the woman Andrea trying to look like she knows something, which when she opens her mouth, it is obvious she doesn’t.
    Lets get on with things that need done around here, like progress, Alexander has some problems, they aren’t going to be cured by hounding everyone over trivial unimportant matters. Where in the world is the city attorney? Can’t he shut her up? She is obviously the puppet of Shirley and Michelle, trying to get back into office again.
    There are dog issues, burned out hovel issues, and street issues just to name a few!
    By the way, the McKeon’s sitting on the front row telling her what to say doesn’t show us much either!
    As for the money going to these people who are wanting paid for driving to Little Rock – voice it at the polls, I sure will!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Reports are not given "bob mac" if they were then why did the Mayor himself not have an explanation as to where the Police/Fire/resume/ final financials were? Talk about grand standing you have 21 days of unaccounted funds! Now it may be a bit boring for other paid officials to care were the "citizens" money goes but not me!!! I have fought/disagreed with Shirley Johnson and Michelle Hobbs over the same issues, I have nor will never be a "puppet" for anyone, it's sad we now have 3 for what's wrong. For the record I said it in the meeting, the planning commission has NO authority to make rulings for this city.....so the commission has to bring it to the Mayor and council. I have seen NO reason why JOHNSON is not eligible to be on it...other than scorned or fractured egos!!! Get over it, this city should be done with the develished, racist, and sexists behavior. This position was posted for 3 months. Please let me remind those that were not there and those that were, the Mayor spoke highly of her as well as every council member present voted FOR her! The only negativity is here, now you can either choose to move forward or live in the past. Your choice, I just wish the people who hide behind the fictitious names will speak up in person and have a positive solution instead of all this negativity!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Talk about grandstanding!
      You are now he keeper of 'right' and 'wrong'!?!?!?!
      There are 8 votes at that table, and hopefully 8 opinions. You are no more right than any of them, and occasionally no more wrong (in my own opinion)
      I am sure you realize 'wrong' in this arena simply means they don't agree with you.

      Delete
    2. What meeting were you at where the mayor, "Spoke highly" of Shirley Johnson? He agreed Ward-1 wasn't represented on the the planning commission. That's not exactly a raving endorsement. I won't be surprised to see her name back on the ballot for mayor. A lot of people went to a lot of trouble to get her out of city hall and you just hold the door open for her and invite her back in. By the way, how did you get a hold of her resume when the other aldermen didn't get one? That still smells, Andrea Arnold!

      Delete
  11. Ms Bearden, I only know what I see. I have written what I see. I asked for a copy of the financials; and can only deduct that YOU DON’T WANT TO ACCEPT that they are in order. There is a problem, but it isn’t in the end of the financial reports you like to pick apart.
    I asked where this information came from and the problem was presented by YOU, it was demanded at council to be adopted by YOU, all your little lambs followed – Pelosi style – and passed it without reading it; which is why we are stuck with a lot of junk YOU demand.
    I have witnessed YOU speak against the very people you now buddy with; calling them names, degrading them, etc.
    Bob-Mac is my name, you wouldn't know me if you faced me in the street. But in my estimation – alderwoman speaks with forked tongue.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And as we have seen in your post, you yourself have a forked bias tongue. The proposed budge you speak of was handed out to ALL council the first of January but you know that, you just choose to print lies and untruths. You are right about 8 different voices, I myself wish the paid officials would pick up and study what is given to them and ask why we don't have our reports outlined in the organization. Hum talk about grandstanding. One more thing "bob mac" you are right I do not recognize fictional people and I hope the smart people of Alexander realize what kind of lies and hatred you and several do, and you call yourself Christians. Shame

      Delete
    2. I didn't call myself anything, Christian or otherwise.
      That is a religious issue; this is basic civics.
      Because of your response, it seems you haven't ready any of the city's operational documents yourself.
      All issues have sides, that doesn't make them "lies" YOUR TERM not mine. We need aldermen who understand civics 101. Turmoil isn't the answer, we have seen it for years, it just doesn't work. Your residents are as sick of it as any group on earth would be.
      Looks to me like your understanding of financials and others understanding, you should grandstand for a CPA.

      Delete
  12. Oh one last thing, I just wanted to thank all the negative fictional persons who blog on this sight, it has caused a lot of calls of support from people who don't mind knowing who they are when they have questions or concerns. Thanks again

    ReplyDelete
  13. It seems Mrs. Bearden has a lot of people against her all of the sudden. I think Mrs. Bearden should call out who Alex is???? She knows who they are and now they have used her and are done with her. It's as if they threw her under the bus!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No ... she threw us under the bus.

      Delete
    2. Micro managing! One person is one vote, get over yourself.
      Freedom of speech, freedom of expression, press, and such are still the law of the land, might not be for long, but for today it still is.
      The liberal left never seem to enjoy these rights, they use them.

      Delete
    3. Yes they did! I would not stand for someone telling me how to vote or who to like

      Delete
  14. First of all during the last administration Andrea Bearden was all for doing away with Former Mayor Shirley Johnson's so called retirement .... oh and by the way the City of Alexander has no retirement plan. And at the last City Council Meeting Ms. Bearden springs it on the City Council to add Shirley Johnson to the Planning Committee. By the way Ms. Bearden was the only member of the City Council that had her resume. NOW ISN'T THAT FUNNY!

    ReplyDelete
  15. It makes no difference what the Planning Committee does. It still has to come before the City Council for a VOTE!

    ReplyDelete
  16. I saw were Mrs. Churchill was in support of recalling a little troll. We all can assume that Mrs Churchill was taking about Mr. Mullins. Not very Christian Mrs. Churchill and very classless. But you are a classless lady who wanted Mayor Mitchell removed until he gave your grandsons, girlfriend a job!!!! Classless!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  17. You named him very quickly, that is your opinion - Who knows, 'troll' might be YOU!
    Giving Kirstin a job wasn't the deciding factor. It was learning the facts, making up my own mind and not listening to hateful busybodies, out town is populated with a lot of people who seem to prefer creating an imaginary 'case of events' or 'case of status' or 'case of . . . .' and not taking the time and effort to collect all the facts, THEN ADDING TO THE MIX THE GOSSIP OF SPREADING THEIR IMAGINATION AS FACT. This is the basis of all the division we experience in Alexander.
    By the way, I am the one who laid Kirstin off. Today she is a happy stay-at-home Mom, and a valued member of my family.
    I might remind you the caste system died off long ago.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As I said earlier, this site is for giving opinions, all are entitled to express theirs, condemning those who do gives the impression only you are entitled to an opinion.
      Lets keep it fair, after all this site is just that - A SITE TO EXPRESS YOUR OPINIONS. And those who use pseudonyms should feel comfortable doing just that. Whether it is for your protection or for the purpose of giving an opinion and not having it rejected on sight just because it has your name attached – it is a valuable mode of sharing opinions and information.
      Big thanks to Alex-N-Der for their editorials, especially this one. Just know this is just the PUBLISHED information, but then don’t let your imagination run wild!

      Delete
  18. I saw were meth arrest were on the rise in Saline county. Has anyone seen the First Lady of Alexander lately?

    ReplyDelete
  19. Yes I have seen Ms. Mitchell several times and if you are so interested in her please attend the Monthly City Council Meetings as she attends these meetings. By the way the MEETINGS are held on the 3rd Monday of each month. And by the way she is doing AWESOME but some people just have to bring up "OLD NEWS". Maybe you need to sweep your own BACK PORCH and leave other people alone. So go to the Meetings and see her for yourself.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Yes, matter of fact I have.
    "Wendy, you are dangerous, vicious, hate-filled and destructive; an ILL WIND, nothing more! Shame on you. Alexander does not need the likes of you. You could not hold a candle to the light the Lady you are trying to melign shares with us.

    ReplyDelete
  21. MAN!!! "Wendy" doesn't change his/her character at all does he/she - all through this blog all you see is one rotten apple, spreading hate and gossip.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Maybe "Wendy" needs to find herself _(in a corrective place) like a church, where she can get a life, and maybe learn to forgive, and become less vicious , mean, and hate filled, Mrs. M has one. in Alexander. Maybe she could help Wendy become a better person.,( sounds as if she needs it)

    ReplyDelete
  23. I have heard Alderman Andy Mullins has TOLD an Alexander Fireman not to be talking a citizen that lives in the Ward he serves. An Alderman has no business, much less no right to tell anyone who to talk to.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Sounds like the alderman talks too much

    ReplyDelete
  25. I feel sorry for people who are afraid to live in a world that has other people in it. There should be no fear, or retribution, or rioting, or civil unrest or paranoia in differing opinions.
    I know I got carried away there a little bit, but it's the same mindset, and we see it on the news everyday. Whether you are afraid of rioting or afraid of conversation, the problem is the inability to handle the fear!

    ReplyDelete
  26. Alexander needs to stand up and take the city back! Whether you are paid or not on council, you still represent the PEOPLE of this city! Paycheck or not, you work for THEM! THE CITIZENS! Get your heads out of the dark holes and unplug your ears and move forward with what this city has to offer! My neighbors are like family to me. We look out for one another. There is no reason why the council can't do the same! Afterall, we ELECTED THEM TO REPRESENT US AND ATTEND TO ISSUES WE SEE AS IMPORTANT! Alexander ---- PLEASE SHOW UP MONDAY NIGHT AND TAKE YOUR CITY BACK!!!

    ReplyDelete
  27. I wonder if there will ever be an editorial as good as this one, and if we will ever see the response this one invoked! Thanks, Alex for all you do!

    ReplyDelete