Alexander officials have had to find a different funding path to
fulfill their dream of buying a new firetruck. When trying to process the loan, that was approved during a previous
special meeting, they learned Arkansas' five-year loan maximum is
still in effect.
During a special
meeting held June 5 the Alexander City Council, after a tie-breaking
vote by Mayor Crystal Herrmann, approved the purchase of a new
firetruck through the use of a ten-year loan. According to sources,
when attempting to process the loan with Government Capital
Corporation, city officials were told Arkansas only allows a maximum
of five years on loans. Those who voted "Yes" were relying
on a rumor the Arkansas Legislature had recently increased it to
ten-years.
Counties and
municipalities are limited to a maximum of five-years for loans under
Amendment-78 of the Arkansas Constitution. The attempt now is to
purchase the firetruck using Amendment-65, which allows the use of a
secured revenue bond or lease.
Jim Templeton, from
First Security Bank, explained the process to acquire a secured
revenue bond or lease. The City of Alexander has all of its accounts
with First Security Bank.
"You've got
Amendment 78 and you have Amendment 65," Templeton said.
"Seventy-Eight financing allows anything for five years or less.
If you want to go longer on your financing, you have to go with
Amendment 65."
"It's a revenue
bond or lease. It can be worded either way," Templeton
continued. "And, it just has to have a pledge to secure payment
to go out further than five years."
Templeton explained
how any funding source can be used as security except taxes.
Franchise fees are one option.
"You have a
franchise fees [sic] that you get $105,000 a year. You can pledge
those," Templeton said. "You don't have to use them because
you already have the money that you can pay for (it), the yearly note
on the fire truck and the fire department's budget. But to extend it
(the loan) out longer than five years, you have to make that pledge.
To do that, you just need to make an ordinance, (or) a referendum."
During the special
meeting held June 5, McCormick laid out how the firetruck will be
financed. Most of the funding for the payments will come from a
combination of annual ACT 833 funds and savings from not having to
repair old firetrucks. Funding for the ACT 833 program is provided
annually by the State to allow fire departments to buy needed
equipment.
"Between 2020
and 2022, we spent $252,000.00 on general maintenance of our
firetrucks," McCormick said at the June 5 meeting. "Just
last year, we spent $135,000, ... on just maintenance and trying to
keep our firetrucks moving."
"The city of
Alexander Fire Department receives (ACT) 833 money every year and
adds up to $26,754.00," McCormick said. "If you subtract
that from the $74,000 payment a year, that adds basically $48,680
left for what we owe off of the fire department."
McCormick also
planned to take money received from selling the two oldest firetrucks
and put that towards the purchase of the new truck. One truck has
already been sold.
"Also, we were
able to sell one of our fire trucks that we have this past week that
brought in $90,000," McCormick said at the regular June 19
meeting. "$81,000 of that is going to go on a down payment to
the fire truck, the new fire truck."
"So, basically
in the long run, we're still paying $582,000 for the fire truck,"
he continued. "We're paying, we're financing $501,000 for the
fire truck."
When asked by
Council Member Harold Timmerman why only $81,000 of the $90,000 is
being used on the down payment, McCormick explained the missing $9,000
was the 10-percent fee paid to sell the truck through a dealer.
Templeton said
Amendment 65 allows for the funding of capital improvements. Council
Member Joy Gray questioned calling a firetruck a capital improvement.
"[C]apital
improvement tends to be fixed things and things that are attached to
those fixed things, not cars, trucks, things like that," Gray
said. "So because I work in the state and I have done capital
improvement stuff, for me, a truck is an asset. As opposed to a
capital improvement."
"I don't want
on the back end, Leg Audit (Arkansas Division of Legislative Audit)
coming in and being like, 'This isn't a capital improvement, this is
an asset,'" Gray said.
"That's what
Amendment 65 is all about," Templeton replied.
Under "2020
Arkansas Code Title 19 - Public Finance Chapter 9 - Public
Obligations Subchapter 6 - Revenue Bond Act of 1987 - 19-9-604
Definitions," Part (C); legal purchases under this financing
option includes, "Any furnishings, machinery, vehicles,
apparatus, or equipment for any public betterment or improvement,
which shall include, without limiting the generality of the
foregoing, the following: ... (iv) Firefighting facilities and
apparatus."
Council members
received a quick lesson in the process needed to establish a revenue
bond. The explanation mirrored Arkansas Code § 19-9-607 (2020),
which in part states;
"(a) No
proclamation, order, or ordinance prescribed by § 19-9-606 shall be
entered by a governing body until the governing body, the
governmental unit, or the delegate of either shall have conducted a
public hearing, ... (2) or; In the case of a city or county issuing
bonds, within the city or county."
"(b) At least
ten (10) days before the date set for the public hearing, notice of
the hearing shall be published one (1) time in a newspaper of general
circulation: (1) In the locality to be affected."
"(c) The notice
shall: (1) Contain a general description of the purpose or purposes
for which the bonds are to be issued; (2) Contain the maximum
principal amount of the bonds; and (3) State the date, time, and
place of the public hearing."
The resolution,
approved at the June 19 regular council meeting, only agrees to
purchase the fire truck, "(B)y entering into a Lease Purchase
Agreement with First Security Bank for $501,000 at an interest rate
of 5.95% per annum for a term of ten (10) years." It does not
establish the revenue bonds needed to finance the, "Lease
Purchase Agreement."
Voting "Yes"
to adopt the resolution were Joy
Gray, Angela Griffin, Joe Pollard, Mitchell
W. Smith, Tony
Staton, Gina
R Thomas.
Voting "No" were Harold Timmerman and
Juanita Wilson.